（马克思的那个年代，有很多知识分子想通过“社会主义”来改变自己的国家，改变社会，在全球各地都是，在中国，最著名的是鲁迅。可以说包括马克思在内的他们有善良、正义的想法，为了社会利益放在个人利益之上，他们的人品是比很多人高的这点值得点赞。
但是方法有对、错之分，马克思的许多观点是错的，否则也不会实践了这么多年，现在全球近两百个国家当中，只剩下北朝鲜一个国家是实行马克思所要求的官营经济，其它国家都是变成了民营经济为主的经济发展模式。而且现在北朝鲜都准备经济改革，发展民营经济了。
本系列文章会分析清楚马克思的观点错误，和没有按照他要求的观点，经济改革后的中国、越南、老挝为什么经济好了起来。）
腾讯官方《短史记》的文章《中国古代不存在“农民起义”》写了中国古代不存在“农民起义”。
马克思把做为商人的雇主描绘得那么差，那么为什么中国古代也没有一次大的雇员反对雇主的暴动？就是因为雇主和雇员是自然的合作关系，工资是协商好的，之间的矛盾远没有马克思描绘得那么深。反而是后来雇员们获得了马克思的知识灌输，认为雇主必然剥削他们，才罢工连连。
古代社会的主要矛盾，其实是皇帝压迫其它人来稳固皇位，官员利用手中的权力压迫权力更小的农民、商人的矛盾。所以有暴动也是他们反对政府的暴动。
但当农民、商人暴动胜利了，他们又成为下一个皇帝，周而复始，因为不是法治社会，大家不能合理的保护自己的权利。
---
(translation)
No riot in ancient China was caused by the oppression of merchants
(In the era of Marx, there were many intellectuals who wanted to change their country and society through "socialism." It is everywhere in the world. In China, the most famous is Lu Xun. It can be said that they, including Marx, have goodness 1. The idea of justice is put above the personal interest for the benefit of society. Their character is higher than many people. This is worthy of praise.
But the methods are right and wrong. Many of Marx ’s views are wrong, otherwise they will not be practiced for so many years. Among the nearly 200 countries in the world, only one country in North Korea is the official economy required by Marx. In other countries, the economic development model has become a private economy. And now North Korea is preparing for economic reforms and developing a private economy.
In this series of articles, I will analyze clearly Marx's wrong views and why he did not follow the economic view of China, Vietnam, and Laos after the economic reform. )
但是方法有对、错之分，马克思的许多观点是错的，否则也不会实践了这么多年，现在全球近两百个国家当中，只剩下北朝鲜一个国家是实行马克思所要求的官营经济，其它国家都是变成了民营经济为主的经济发展模式。而且现在北朝鲜都准备经济改革，发展民营经济了。
本系列文章会分析清楚马克思的观点错误，和没有按照他要求的观点，经济改革后的中国、越南、老挝为什么经济好了起来。）
腾讯官方《短史记》的文章《中国古代不存在“农民起义”》写了中国古代不存在“农民起义”。
马克思把做为商人的雇主描绘得那么差，那么为什么中国古代也没有一次大的雇员反对雇主的暴动？就是因为雇主和雇员是自然的合作关系，工资是协商好的，之间的矛盾远没有马克思描绘得那么深。反而是后来雇员们获得了马克思的知识灌输，认为雇主必然剥削他们，才罢工连连。
古代社会的主要矛盾，其实是皇帝压迫其它人来稳固皇位，官员利用手中的权力压迫权力更小的农民、商人的矛盾。所以有暴动也是他们反对政府的暴动。
但当农民、商人暴动胜利了，他们又成为下一个皇帝，周而复始，因为不是法治社会，大家不能合理的保护自己的权利。
---
(translation)
No riot in ancient China was caused by the oppression of merchants
(In the era of Marx, there were many intellectuals who wanted to change their country and society through "socialism." It is everywhere in the world. In China, the most famous is Lu Xun. It can be said that they, including Marx, have goodness 1. The idea of justice is put above the personal interest for the benefit of society. Their character is higher than many people. This is worthy of praise.
But the methods are right and wrong. Many of Marx ’s views are wrong, otherwise they will not be practiced for so many years. Among the nearly 200 countries in the world, only one country in North Korea is the official economy required by Marx. In other countries, the economic development model has become a private economy. And now North Korea is preparing for economic reforms and developing a private economy.
In this series of articles, I will analyze clearly Marx's wrong views and why he did not follow the economic view of China, Vietnam, and Laos after the economic reform. )
The article "Short History" by Tencent's official "Short History" https://sssinai.blogspot.com/2020/04/blog-post_94.html wrote that there was no "peasant uprising" in ancient China.
Marx portrays employers as businessmen so poorly, so why hasn't there been a big employee in ancient China against employer riots? It is because employers and employees are a natural cooperative relationship, and wages are negotiated, and the contradiction between them is far from being as deep as Marx described. Instead, employees later acquired Marx ’s knowledge and believed that employers must exploit them before they went on strike.
The main contradiction in ancient society was actually the contradiction that the emperor oppressed other people to stabilize the throne, and officials used the power in their hands to oppress farmers and businessmen with less power. Therefore, when there is a riot, they also oppose the government's riots.
But when the peasants and businessmen riots triumphed, they became the next emperor again and again, because it was not a society ruled by law, and everyone could not reasonably protect their rights.
评论
发表评论