西方也是公有制

“公有制”是“生产资料”不进行个人或集体的排他性占有，“生产资料”是劳动者进行生产时所需要使用的资源或工具，钱属于生产资料。在苏联时，在毛泽东时期时，在朝鲜时，在越南时，有没有人能拿隔壁家的钱来自己用？不能。能不能拿隔壁家的土地种我想种的东西？不能。这种就是排他性占有。

如果政府能调用个人的生产资料就是公有制，西方也是公有制：

如美国宪法规定：

国会有权处置合众国之属地及其它产业，并制定有关这些属地及产业的一切必要的法规和章则”“不给予公平赔偿，私有财产不得充作公用”“不经正当法律程序，不得剥夺任何人的生命、自由或财产。

美国的关键官员（如国会议员）是由公民直接或间接选出来，国会可以立法调配国民的财产。以下的

德国宪法第十四条规定：

一、财产权及继承权应予保障，其内容与限制由法律规定之。
二、财产权负有义务。财产权之行使应同时有益于公共福利。
三、财产之征收，必须为公共福利始得为之。其执行，必须根据法律始得为之，此项法律应规定赔偿之性质与范围。赔偿之决定应公平衡量公共利益与关系人之利益。赔偿范围如有争执，得向普通法院提起诉讼。

第十五条规定：

土地与地产、天然资源与生产工具，为达成社会化之目的，得由法律规定转移为公有财产或其他形式之公营经济，此项法律应规定赔偿之性质与范围。关于赔偿，适用本基本法第十四条第三项第三、四两段。 ”

瑞典宪法规定：

第一条：
……在以剥夺所有权或其他类似方式征用任何个人的财产时，保障有关当事人有依照法律规定的原则取得赔偿的权利。

第二条：
有关平民的个人地位或者他们相互之间的人身关系和经济关系，均由法律加以规定。
这些规定包括：
1、有关瑞典国籍的规定。
2、有关姓氏权、婚姻与出身、遗产与遗嘱以及其他家庭事务的规定。
3、有关动产与不动产权利的规定，有关合同的规定以及有关公司、协会、团体和基金会的规定。

大部分外国都有这种国会可以动用私人财产的法律。

---

(translation)

The West is also public ownership

"Public ownership" means that "production means" do not carry out exclusive possession by individuals or collectives. "Production means" are the resources or tools that laborers need to use for production. In the Soviet Union, during the Mao Zedong period, in North Korea, and in Vietnam, could anyone use the money from the next door for their own use? Can't. Can I use the land next door to plant what I want to plant? Can't. This is exclusive possession.

If the government can transfer individual means of production to public ownership, the West also has public ownership:

As stated in the US Constitution:

The Congress has the right to dispose of the territories and other industries of the United States, and to formulate all necessary laws and regulations concerning these territories and industries "" No fair compensation shall be given, private property shall not be used for public purposes "" Due to due legal process, shall not be denied Anyone's life, freedom or property.

Key US officials (such as members of Congress) are directly or indirectly elected by citizens, and Congress can legislate to allocate national property. below

Article 14 of the German Constitution provides:

1. Property rights and inheritance rights shall be protected, and their contents and restrictions shall be prescribed by law.

2. The property right is obligated. The exercise of property rights should also benefit public welfare.
3. The expropriation of property must be based on public welfare. Its implementation must be done in accordance with the law, and this law should specify the nature and scope of compensation. The compensation decision should fairly weigh the public interest and the interests of related parties. If there is any dispute over the scope of compensation, a lawsuit may be brought to the ordinary court.

Article 15 provides:

Land and real estate, natural resources and production tools may be transferred to public property or other forms of public economy by the law in order to achieve the purpose of socialization. This law shall specify the nature and scope of compensation. Regarding compensation, the third and fourth paragraphs of Article 14, paragraph 3 of this Basic Law apply. "

The Swedish Constitution provides:

Article 1:
... when expropriating any individual ’s property by deprivation of ownership or other similar methods, the parties concerned are guaranteed the right to obtain compensation in accordance with the principles prescribed by law.

Article 2:
The personal status of the civilians concerned or their personal and economic relations are regulated by law.
These regulations include:

1. Regulations concerning Swedish nationality.
2. Regulations on surname rights, marriage and birth, inheritance and will, and other family matters.
3. The provisions on the rights of movable and immovable property, the provisions of relevant contracts and the provisions of companies, associations, groups and foundations.

Most foreign countries have such laws that Congress can use private property.