《三国志》记载蜀国国君刘备死前对大臣诸葛亮说：
“君才十倍曹丕，必能安国，终定大事。若嗣子可辅，辅之；如其不才，君可自取。”
亮涕泣曰：“臣敢竭[1]股肱之力，效忠贞之节，继之以死！”[2]
“君才十倍曹丕，必能安国，终定大事。若嗣子可辅，辅之；如其不才，君可自取。”“你的才能是曹丕的十倍，必定能够安顿国家，终可成就大事。如果嗣子刘禅可以辅助，便辅助他；如果他没有才干，你可以自行取度。
诸葛亮涕泣地说：“臣必定竭尽股肱的力量，报效忠贞的节气，直到死为止！”
中国历史专业的人可能都知道，古代皇帝常咔嚓人，能力越高的可能越被咔嚓、血缘关系近的男性也有危险，如明朝的王爷过着半软禁一样的生活、雍正时的九子夺嫡（九个儿子争王位）后，雍正治自己的兄弟。[3]
现代即使是蒋介石，陈诚不满他独裁，也与他最后一个信任的非血缘关系的人决裂
《晓松奇谈: 蒋介石和陈诚决裂, 陈诚临死前大呼一句话, 气愤呕血而亡》，蒋介石也把全国军战绩最好的将领孙立人囚禁。
《晓松奇谈: 蒋介石和陈诚决裂, 陈诚临死前大呼一句话, 气愤呕血而亡》，蒋介石也把全国军战绩最好的将领孙立人囚禁。
还有好将领被冤杀，著名的有汉朝的韩信、南宋的岳飞、明朝的于谦……。
杀他们的皇帝是不是要防范心这么重？杀岳飞的宋高宗，见同杀岳飞的秦桧时，也要靴子里面藏刀防范秦桧，宋高宗传位给儿子赵眘后，给东西给赵眘吃，赵眘都不敢吃。
某种情况下需要，因为历史上不用外患袭击，也有各种本集团的人杀皇帝，太监、大臣、亲属（包括母亲、儿子、兄弟）。
究其原因，因为不是法治社会和有死刑，有死刑，人死了就没有了反击的机会，不是法治，定什么罪名，最能调动武力的人说了算，最能调动武力的人是孤家寡人，面对这么多其它的人，就要常常打压，而且不允许上下循环，要终身制，只允许自己的儿子继位，因为自己的儿子杀自己的概率小。而居于下面的人会有强烈的不安全感，所以大家都去争抢最能调动武力地位的那个位置。一旦拿到这个位置，我就要去除能威胁我的人。
每个朝代的朝廷人们，要么越来越笨，无力治国，帝国走向腐败没落，外患入侵。要么属下起兵造反，经过一将功成万骨枯，该将登顶皇位，开始清除能力强的人，甚至是开国功臣。
如此周而复始。
西方也会这样，曾经权力落于近卫军之上，结果长期皇帝被近卫军毙命，平均几年死于非命一个，直到皇帝重新削弱近卫军的实力，回到皇帝掌大权。
只有在一个法制社会，法律能管所有的人，起诉方、被起诉方和判决方不是同一方，才能解决这个问题。
来源：
---
(translation)
The ancient emperor's killings
The ancient emperor's killings
"Three Kingdoms" records that Liu Bei, the monarch of the Kingdom of Shu, told his minister Zhuge Liang before his death:
"The prince is ten times as good as Cao Pi, and he will be able to secure his country and will eventually decide a major event. If heirs can assist, supplement it;
Liang Shi wept: "The officials dare to exhaust [^ 2] the strength of the arm, follow the festival of loyalty, and then die!" [^ 1]
"The prince is ten times as strong as Cao Pi, and he will be able to secure his country and will eventually decide a major event. If heirs can help, they can help; if they are not talented, the prince can take it himself.""Your talent is ten times that of Cao Pi, and you will be able to settle the country and achieve great things in the end. If heir Liu Chan can assist him, he will assist him; if he has no talents, you can take it yourself.
Zhuge Liang said with a sob: "The vassals will do their best to exert their bravery strength and serve the loyalty of solar terms until they die!"
People with Chinese history may know that the ancient emperors often sang people, and the more capable they were, the more likely they were to have sang and men with close kinship. For example, the prince of the Ming Dynasty lived like semi-house arrest, and the nine sons of Yongzheng After taking the heirs (nine sons fighting for the throne), Yong Zhengzhi ruled his brother. [^ 5]
Even though Chiang Kai-shek and Chen Cheng were dissatisfied with his dictatorship in modern times, he broke with the last person he trusted and was not related to blood
"[Xiao Songqi Talk: Chiang Kai-shek and Chen Cheng broke up, Chen Cheng shouted a sentence before he died, and died of anger and vomiting blood"] (http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMzk0MDQwMDg1Mg==.html?sharekey=c3010abfa3f70757ef66a5dbfadfe1f97), Chiang Kai-shek also imprisoned Sun Liren, the general with the best military record in the country.
"[Xiao Songqi Talk: Chiang Kai-shek and Chen Cheng broke up, Chen Cheng shouted a sentence before he died, and died of anger and vomiting blood"] (http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMzk0MDQwMDg1Mg==.html?sharekey=c3010abfa3f70757ef66a5dbfadfe1f97), Chiang Kai-shek also imprisoned Sun Liren, the general with the best military record in the country.
There are also good generals who have been killed unjustly, notably Han Xin of the Han Dynasty, Yue Fei of the Southern Song Dynasty, and Yu Qian of the Ming Dynasty ...
Should the emperor who killed them want to guard against such a heavy heart? When Song Gaozong, who killed Yue Fei, and Qin Hui, who killed Yue Fei, also wanted to keep a knife in his boots to prevent Qin Hui, Song Gaozong passed on to his son Zhao Shen and gave it to Zhao Shen, but Zhao Shen dared not eat it.
In some cases, it is necessary because there are no external attacks in history, and there are various people in the group who killed the emperor, eunuchs, ministers, and relatives (including mothers, sons, and brothers).
The reason is because it is not a society ruled by law and there is a death penalty. If there is a death penalty, there is no chance of a counterattack when a person dies. It is not the rule of law. What is the conviction? The person who can mobilize force is the last one, and the person who can mobilize force is an orphan. In the face of so many other people, it is often necessary to suppress them, and it is not allowed to cycle up and down, and it is necessary to have a lifelong system. Only their sons are allowed to succeed, because their sons have a low probability of killing themselves. The people underneath will have a strong sense of insecurity, so everyone will fight for the position that can best mobilize the status of force. Once I get this position, I will remove the people who can threaten me.
The court people of each dynasty were either becoming more and more stupid, unable to govern the country, the empire was corrupted, and foreign invasions invaded. Either the subordinates rebelled, and after a long success, they would ascend to the throne and begin to eliminate powerful people, even the founding heroes.
So again and again.
The same is true in the West. Once the power fell on the Guards, the emperor was killed by the Guards for a long time, and the average died for a few years. Until the Emperor weakened the Guards again, he returned to the Emperor.
Only in a legal society where the law can control all people, the prosecution, the accused and the judgment party are not the same party can solve this problem.
source:
[^ 1]: "Three Kingdoms" / Volume 35 · Shuzhi · Zhuge Liangzhuan.
[^ 2]: "Zi Zhi Tong Jian" / Wei Ji Wei Jiyi The same content, but it seems that there is one more word, write "endless".
[^ 5]: Cognitive Bible "Why not superstition literature and art", 2019.
[^ 1]: "Three Kingdoms" / Volume 35 · Shuzhi · Zhuge Liangzhuan.
[^ 2]: "Zi Zhi Tong Jian" / Wei Ji Wei Jiyi The same content, but it seems that there is one more word, write "endless".
[^ 5]: Cognitive Bible "Why not superstition literature and art", 2019.
评论
发表评论