（马克思的那个年代，有很多知识分子想通过“社会主义”来改变自己的国家，改变社会，在全球各地都是，在中国，最著名的是鲁迅。可以说包括马克思在内的他们有善良、正义的想法，为了社会利益放在个人利益之上，他们的人品是比很多人高的这点值得点赞。
但是方法有对、错之分，马克思的许多观点是错的，否则也不会实践了这么多年，现在全球近两百个国家当中，只剩下北朝鲜一个国家是实行马克思所要求的官营经济，其它国家都是变成了民营经济为主的经济发展模式。而且现在北朝鲜都准备经济改革，发展民营经济了。
本系列文章会分析清楚马克思的观点错误，和没有按照他要求的观点，经济改革后的中国、越南、老挝为什么经济好了起来。）
马克思说中国古代是封建社会。
其实“封建”是皇帝、国王没能力直接管理大面积的领土，只能把亲信、功臣和贵族派到中央以外的地方揽大权进行管理，这叫“封”，在中国的这些地方（国家）之间挖沟，土放在两侧，种上树。地方建立的皇帝、国王以外的国家叫“建”。比如中国“百家争鸣”时，孔子、孟子、墨子周游列国，纵横家在各国中合纵连横。而这些国家形式上听命于周天子。这个是“封建社会”。
欧洲也是这样，皇帝、国王没能力管理大面积的领土，把自己的亲戚派出去揽大权进行管理。
中国古代除了郡县制的秦朝，只有西汉之前是封建社会。
后来中国实行科举制，平民可以通过考试的上升通道，获得官位，获得新土地，皇帝可以对大臣进行抄家，控制力比欧洲强，大臣不是欧洲那样的世袭地位。
---
(translation)
Ancient China is not a feudal society by Marx
Marx said that ancient China was a feudal society.
In fact, "feudalism" is that emperors and kings are unable to directly manage large areas of territory. They can only send cronies, heroes, and nobles to places outside the center to take charge of the management. This is called "feudalism". Dig trenches between them, put soil on both sides, and plant trees. Countries other than emperors and kings established locally are called "jian". For example, in China's "hundreds of schools of thought," Confucius, Mencius, and Mozi traveled all over the country, and strategists joined forces in various countries. These countries formally obey Zhou Tianzi. This is "feudal society".
The same is true in Europe, where emperors and kings are unable to manage large areas and send their relatives to take power.
In ancient China, except for the Qin dynasty, which was governed by counties and counties, only the Western Han Dynasty was a feudal society.
Later, in China, the imperial examination system was adopted. Civilians could pass the exam to gain access to the ranks and obtain new land. The emperor could copy the house of the minister, and the control was stronger than that in Europe. The minister was not hereditary in Europe.
但是方法有对、错之分，马克思的许多观点是错的，否则也不会实践了这么多年，现在全球近两百个国家当中，只剩下北朝鲜一个国家是实行马克思所要求的官营经济，其它国家都是变成了民营经济为主的经济发展模式。而且现在北朝鲜都准备经济改革，发展民营经济了。
本系列文章会分析清楚马克思的观点错误，和没有按照他要求的观点，经济改革后的中国、越南、老挝为什么经济好了起来。）
马克思说中国古代是封建社会。
其实“封建”是皇帝、国王没能力直接管理大面积的领土，只能把亲信、功臣和贵族派到中央以外的地方揽大权进行管理，这叫“封”，在中国的这些地方（国家）之间挖沟，土放在两侧，种上树。地方建立的皇帝、国王以外的国家叫“建”。比如中国“百家争鸣”时，孔子、孟子、墨子周游列国，纵横家在各国中合纵连横。而这些国家形式上听命于周天子。这个是“封建社会”。
欧洲也是这样，皇帝、国王没能力管理大面积的领土，把自己的亲戚派出去揽大权进行管理。
中国古代除了郡县制的秦朝，只有西汉之前是封建社会。
后来中国实行科举制，平民可以通过考试的上升通道，获得官位，获得新土地，皇帝可以对大臣进行抄家，控制力比欧洲强，大臣不是欧洲那样的世袭地位。
---
(translation)
Ancient China is not a feudal society by Marx
Marx said that ancient China was a feudal society.
In fact, "feudalism" is that emperors and kings are unable to directly manage large areas of territory. They can only send cronies, heroes, and nobles to places outside the center to take charge of the management. This is called "feudalism". Dig trenches between them, put soil on both sides, and plant trees. Countries other than emperors and kings established locally are called "jian". For example, in China's "hundreds of schools of thought," Confucius, Mencius, and Mozi traveled all over the country, and strategists joined forces in various countries. These countries formally obey Zhou Tianzi. This is "feudal society".
The same is true in Europe, where emperors and kings are unable to manage large areas and send their relatives to take power.
In ancient China, except for the Qin dynasty, which was governed by counties and counties, only the Western Han Dynasty was a feudal society.
Later, in China, the imperial examination system was adopted. Civilians could pass the exam to gain access to the ranks and obtain new land. The emperor could copy the house of the minister, and the control was stronger than that in Europe. The minister was not hereditary in Europe.
评论
发表评论