（马克思的那个年代，有很多知识分子想通过“社会主义”来改变自己的国家，改变社会，在全球各地都是，在中国，最著名的是鲁迅。可以说包括马克思在内的他们有善良、正义的想法，为了社会利益放在个人利益之上，他们的人品是比很多人高的这点值得点赞。
但是方法有对、错之分，马克思的许多观点是错的，否则也不会实践了这么多年，现在全球近两百个国家当中，只剩下北朝鲜一个国家是实行马克思所要求的官营经济，其它国家都是变成了民营经济为主的经济发展模式。而且现在北朝鲜都准备经济改革，发展民营经济了。
本系列文章会分析清楚马克思的观点错误，和没有按照他要求的观点，经济改革后的中国、越南、老挝为什么经济好了起来。）
（马克思常把不同收入、职业的人固化为"阶级"，并以此区分优劣，比如丑化雇主，美化雇员，实际上人不会因为穿什么衣服而变化道德，如果是变化，也是收入低的人最容易因为经济而犯罪，南韩最近的获奖电影《寄生虫》描述的就是这类事情）
一个人种庄稼时是农民，种桑叶养蚕制做丝绸时是工人，植物成熟收成自己装车不找别人运出去时是工人，卖农产品时是商人，拿钱买盐的时是消费者，地大了或有事不能种地雇佣别人时是地主，农闲读书时是知识分子，发表政见到媒体上时是公知，科举考试通过时是士大夫，国王奖励他世袭的权力时是贵族，发明创建了一个宗教时是教主，夺取国王位置时他是军人，夺取了皇帝位置时他是皇帝，被儿子架空权力时他是太上皇，“看破红尘”出家时他是教徒，在寺庙里种地时他是农民，兵祸、瘟疫来袭他离开寺庙去应聘修水坝时他是工人，编草鞋卖时他是商人。评价他是一个什么人，当成阶级看，会什么阶级都是可又九十九个阶级都不是，他没去世前还有机会换“阶级”。
把他当成具体的一个人看这个人，而不是看身份，我们就能对他进行评价了。
---
(translation)
"Class" movement and evaluation of people
(Marx often solidifies people of different incomes and occupations into "classes", and distinguishes between advantages and disadvantages, such as humiliating employers and beautifying employees. In fact, people will not change their morals because of what they wear. People are most likely to commit crimes because of the economy, and South Korea ’s most recent award-winning movie "Parasite" describes such things)
A person is a farmer when he grows crops, a worker when he grows mulberry leaves and silkworms to make silk, a mature plant harvests when he loads his own car and does not find someone to ship it, a worker, a farmer when selling agricultural products, and a consumer when he buys salt The landlord is a landlord when he is too big or ca n’t farm and hire someone else. He is an intellectual when he is studying in the countryside. He is well-known when he meets the media when he publishes politics. He is a bureaucrat when he passes the imperial examination. The king rewards hereditary power when he is aristocrat. He was the leader when he got a religion, he was a soldier when he took the position of the king, he was the emperor when he took the position of the emperor, he was the emperor when he was overridden by his son, he was a priest when he saw the monk, and he was a monk when he became a monk in the temple A farmer, a military disaster, and a plague hit him. When he left the temple to apply for dam repairs, he was a worker, and when he made straw shoes, he was a businessman. Judging who he is, as a class, what kind of class is possible. Ninety-nine classes are not. He has a chance to change "class" before he dies.
Considering him as a specific person rather than his identity, we can evaluate him.
本系列文章会分析清楚马克思的观点错误，和没有按照他要求的观点，经济改革后的中国、越南、老挝为什么经济好了起来。）
（马克思常把不同收入、职业的人固化为"阶级"，并以此区分优劣，比如丑化雇主，美化雇员，实际上人不会因为穿什么衣服而变化道德，如果是变化，也是收入低的人最容易因为经济而犯罪，南韩最近的获奖电影《寄生虫》描述的就是这类事情）
把他当成具体的一个人看这个人，而不是看身份，我们就能对他进行评价了。
---
(translation)
"Class" movement and evaluation of people
(Marx often solidifies people of different incomes and occupations into "classes", and distinguishes between advantages and disadvantages, such as humiliating employers and beautifying employees. In fact, people will not change their morals because of what they wear. People are most likely to commit crimes because of the economy, and South Korea ’s most recent award-winning movie "Parasite" describes such things)
A person is a farmer when he grows crops, a worker when he grows mulberry leaves and silkworms to make silk, a mature plant harvests when he loads his own car and does not find someone to ship it, a worker, a farmer when selling agricultural products, and a consumer when he buys salt The landlord is a landlord when he is too big or ca n’t farm and hire someone else. He is an intellectual when he is studying in the countryside. He is well-known when he meets the media when he publishes politics. He is a bureaucrat when he passes the imperial examination. The king rewards hereditary power when he is aristocrat. He was the leader when he got a religion, he was a soldier when he took the position of the king, he was the emperor when he took the position of the emperor, he was the emperor when he was overridden by his son, he was a priest when he saw the monk, and he was a monk when he became a monk in the temple A farmer, a military disaster, and a plague hit him. When he left the temple to apply for dam repairs, he was a worker, and when he made straw shoes, he was a businessman. Judging who he is, as a class, what kind of class is possible. Ninety-nine classes are not. He has a chance to change "class" before he dies.
Considering him as a specific person rather than his identity, we can evaluate him.
评论
发表评论