跳至主要内容

“階級”的流動和對人的評價

(馬克思的那個年代,有很多知識分子想通過“社會主義”來改變自己的國家,改變社會,在全球各地都是,在中國,最著名的是魯迅。可以說包括馬克思在內的他們有善良、正義的想法,為了社會利益放在個人利益之上,他們的人品是比很多人高的這點值得點贊。



但是方法有對、錯之分,馬克思的許多觀點是錯的,否則也不會實踐了這麼多年,現在全球近兩百個國家當中,只剩下北朝鮮一個國家是實行馬克思所要求的官營經濟,其它國家都是變成了民營經濟為主的經濟發展模式。而且現在北朝鮮都準備經濟改革,發展民營經濟了。



本系列文章會分析清楚馬克思的觀點錯誤,和沒有按照他要求的觀點,經濟改革後的中國、越南、老撾為什麼經濟好了起來。 )



(馬克思常把不同收入、職業的人固化為"階級",並以此區分優劣,比如醜化雇主,美化僱員,實際上人不會因為穿什麼衣服而變化道德,如果是變化,也是收入低的人最容易因為經濟而犯罪,南韓最近的獲獎電影《寄生蟲》描述的就是這類事情)



一個人種莊稼時是農民,種桑葉養蠶製做絲綢時是工人,植物成熟收成自己裝車不找別人運出去時是工人,賣農產品時是商人,拿錢買鹽的時是消費者,地大了或有事不能種地僱傭別人時是地主,農閒讀書時是知識分子,發表政見到媒體上時是公知,科舉考試通過時是士大夫,國王獎勵他世襲的權力時是貴族,發明創建了一個宗教時是教主,奪取國王位置時他是軍人,奪取了皇帝位置時他是皇帝,被兒子架空權力時他是太上皇,“看破紅塵”出家時他是教徒,在寺廟裡種地時他是農民,兵禍、瘟疫來襲他離開寺廟去應聘修水壩時他是工人,編草鞋賣時他是商人。評價他是一個什麼人,當成階級看,會什麼階級都是可又九十九個階級都不是,他沒去世前還有機會換“階級”。


把他當成具體的一個人看這個人,而不是看身份,我們就能對他進行評價了。

---

(translation)

"Class" movement and evaluation of people

(Marx often solidifies people of different incomes and occupations into "classes", and distinguishes between advantages and disadvantages, such as humiliating employers and beautifying employees. In fact, people will not change their morals because of what they wear. People are most likely to commit crimes because of the economy, and South Korea ’s most recent award-winning movie "Parasite" describes such things)


A person is a farmer when he grows crops, a worker when he grows mulberry leaves and silkworms to make silk, a mature plant harvests when he loads his own car and does not find someone to ship it, a worker, a farmer when selling agricultural products, and a consumer when he buys salt The landlord is a landlord when he is too big or ca n’t farm and hire someone else. He is an intellectual when he is studying in the countryside. He is well-known when he meets the media when he publishes politics. He is a bureaucrat when he passes the imperial examination. The king rewards hereditary power when he is aristocrat. He was the leader when he got a religion, he was a soldier when he took the position of the king, he was the emperor when he took the position of the emperor, he was the emperor when he was overridden by his son, he was a priest when he saw the monk, and he was a monk when he became a monk in the temple A farmer, a military disaster, and a plague hit him. When he left the temple to apply for dam repairs, he was a worker, and when he made straw shoes, he was a businessman. Judging who he is, as a class, what kind of class is possible. Ninety-nine classes are not. He has a chance to change "class" before he dies.


Considering him as a specific person rather than his identity, we can evaluate him.

评论