（馬克思的那個年代，有很多知識分子想通過“社會主義”來改變自己的國家，改變社會，在全球各地都是，在中國，最著名的是魯迅。可以說包括馬克思在內的他們有善良、正義的想法，為了社會利益放在個人利益之上，他們的人品是比很多人高的這點值得點贊。
但是方法有對、錯之分，馬克思的許多觀點是錯的，否則也不會實踐了這麼多年，現在全球近兩百個國家當中，只剩下北朝鮮一個國家是實行馬克思所要求的官營經濟，其它國家都是變成了民營經濟為主的經濟發展模式。而且現在北朝鮮都準備經濟改革，發展民營經濟了。
本系列文章會分析清楚馬克思的觀點錯誤，和沒有按照他要求的觀點，經濟改革後的中國、越南、老撾為什麼經濟好了起來。 ）
騰訊官方《短史記》的文章《中國古代不存在“農民起義”》寫了中國古代不存在“農民起義”。
馬克思把做為商人的雇主描繪得那麼差，那麼為什麼中國古代也沒有一次大的僱員反對雇主的暴動？就是因為雇主和僱員是自然的合作關係，工資是協商好的，之間的矛盾遠沒有馬克思描繪得那麼深。反而是後來僱員們獲得了馬克思的知識灌輸，認為雇主必然剝削他們，才罷工連連。
古代社會的主要矛盾，其實是皇帝壓迫其它人來穩固皇位，官員利用手中的權力壓迫權力更小的農民、商人的矛盾。所以有暴動也是他們反對政府的暴動。
但當農民、商人暴動勝利了，他們又成為下一個皇帝，周而復始，因為不是法治社會，大家不能合理的保護自己的權利。
---
(translation)
No riot in ancient China was caused by the oppression of merchants
(In the era of Marx, there were many intellectuals who wanted to change their country and society through "socialism." It is everywhere in the world. In China, the most famous is Lu Xun. It can be said that they, including Marx, have goodness 1. The idea of justice is put above the personal interest for the benefit of society. Their character is higher than many people. This is worthy of praise.
But the methods are right and wrong. Many of Marx ’s views are wrong, otherwise they will not be practiced for so many years. Among the nearly 200 countries in the world, only one country in North Korea is the official economy required by Marx. In other countries, the economic development model has become a private economy. And now North Korea is preparing for economic reforms and developing a private economy.
In this series of articles, I will analyze clearly Marx's wrong views and why he did not follow the economic view of China, Vietnam, and Laos after the economic reform. )
但是方法有對、錯之分，馬克思的許多觀點是錯的，否則也不會實踐了這麼多年，現在全球近兩百個國家當中，只剩下北朝鮮一個國家是實行馬克思所要求的官營經濟，其它國家都是變成了民營經濟為主的經濟發展模式。而且現在北朝鮮都準備經濟改革，發展民營經濟了。
本系列文章會分析清楚馬克思的觀點錯誤，和沒有按照他要求的觀點，經濟改革後的中國、越南、老撾為什麼經濟好了起來。 ）
騰訊官方《短史記》的文章《中國古代不存在“農民起義”》寫了中國古代不存在“農民起義”。
馬克思把做為商人的雇主描繪得那麼差，那麼為什麼中國古代也沒有一次大的僱員反對雇主的暴動？就是因為雇主和僱員是自然的合作關係，工資是協商好的，之間的矛盾遠沒有馬克思描繪得那麼深。反而是後來僱員們獲得了馬克思的知識灌輸，認為雇主必然剝削他們，才罷工連連。
古代社會的主要矛盾，其實是皇帝壓迫其它人來穩固皇位，官員利用手中的權力壓迫權力更小的農民、商人的矛盾。所以有暴動也是他們反對政府的暴動。
但當農民、商人暴動勝利了，他們又成為下一個皇帝，周而復始，因為不是法治社會，大家不能合理的保護自己的權利。
---
(translation)
No riot in ancient China was caused by the oppression of merchants
(In the era of Marx, there were many intellectuals who wanted to change their country and society through "socialism." It is everywhere in the world. In China, the most famous is Lu Xun. It can be said that they, including Marx, have goodness 1. The idea of justice is put above the personal interest for the benefit of society. Their character is higher than many people. This is worthy of praise.
But the methods are right and wrong. Many of Marx ’s views are wrong, otherwise they will not be practiced for so many years. Among the nearly 200 countries in the world, only one country in North Korea is the official economy required by Marx. In other countries, the economic development model has become a private economy. And now North Korea is preparing for economic reforms and developing a private economy.
In this series of articles, I will analyze clearly Marx's wrong views and why he did not follow the economic view of China, Vietnam, and Laos after the economic reform. )
The article "Short History" by Tencent's official "Short History" https://sssinai.blogspot.com/2020/04/blog-post_94.html wrote that there was no "peasant uprising" in ancient China.
Marx portrays employers as businessmen so poorly, so why hasn't there been a big employee in ancient China against employer riots? It is because employers and employees are a natural cooperative relationship, and wages are negotiated, and the contradiction between them is far from being as deep as Marx described. Instead, employees later acquired Marx ’s knowledge and believed that employers must exploit them before they went on strike.
The main contradiction in ancient society was actually the contradiction that the emperor oppressed other people to stabilize the throne, and officials used the power in their hands to oppress farmers and businessmen with less power. Therefore, when there is a riot, they also oppose the government's riots.
But when the peasants and businessmen riots triumphed, they became the next emperor again and again, because it was not a society ruled by law, and everyone could not reasonably protect their rights.
评论
发表评论